The confrontation between Iran, the United States and Israel is approaching a critical point. Against the backdrop of increasing pressure from Washington and threats of a new military escalation, the question of the future of Iran's nuclear doctrine is becoming increasingly acute.
Can Tehran change its previous approach and turn the nuclear factor into a strategic deterrence tool? Khayal Muazzin analyzes the actions of Donald Trump, Israel's strategy, the position of the IRGC and the possible consequences of a new stage of the conflict for the Middle East and the Caucasus.
Face-off Iran, USA and Israel enters a new and potentially most dangerous stage. The pressure policy of Washington, the actions of Israel and the change in the military-political situation around Iran once again bring to the fore the issue, which until recently was considered mainly as theoretical:
can Tehran reconsider its nuclear doctrine?
In a new analytical issue, an international journalist Khayal Muazzin examines why the administration of the President of the United States Donald Trump faces serious constraints to its strategy in the Middle East and why Iran's leadership and :: the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) they rely less and less on political guarantees and agreements with the West.
Special attention is paid to Israel's strategy and policies Benjamin Netanyahu. Consideration is being given to whether further escalation could push the United States into greater military engagement and what the implications of such a scenario could be for the entire region.
One of the central questions of the analysis is iran's nuclear program and possible change in the principles of strategic deterrence. Can Tehran change the existing approach to the nuclear issue in the new conditions?
Can the factor of nuclear potential itself become an instrument for preventing a major war?
The issue analyzes the reasons why it becomes more difficult for Washington to control the development of the crisis, Israel's strategy, the role of the IRGC, the future of the Iranian nuclear doctrine and the formation of a new regional security architecture.
Will the nuclear factor be the last mechanism for deterring a major war or, on the contrary, will it bring the Middle East closer to an even more dangerous phase of confrontation?